Sana'a-Saba:
"Until now, the issue of the 'day after' the war in Gaza remains the subject of many questions, especially in light of the American positions, which are seen as completely biased towards the Zionist entity, and in light of President Donald Trump's statements, which have been rejected by Arabs, Muslims, and the international community regarding the displacement of the residents of the Gaza Strip."
Trump's proposal to transfer the residents of Gaza outside the Strip created a unified Arab and Islamic front in support of the Palestinians, and in rejection of the displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, and during the past period the features of the Zionist-American vision for the post-war phase to manage the Strip have eroded.
"With the recent prisoner exchange agreement between Hamas and the Zionist entity, and the majestic scenes that accompanied the handover process, a solid fact emerges: Hamas is not just a resistance faction, but rather an embodiment of the will of Gaza. Resistance is not merely a passing tactic; it is an enduring doctrine deeply embedded in the consciousness of the Strip's residents.
The 'day after' has become a project that the Palestinian resistance is shaping with its own hands, through its balanced discourse and wise management. Hamas is redefining what steadfastness means—not only in confronting the occupation, but also in restoring the Islamic and Arab identity that the occupation forces sought to obliterate."
"The head of the Zionist entity's government, war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, promised a complete victory over Hamas and the return of Israeli prisoners by military force. However, he and his government failed to achieve this, as they initially believed this victory could be accomplished within weeks. Additionally, the occupation failed to meet its declared goals.
Most Israelis oppose the presence of large forces in a region that houses around 2.3 million Palestinians, as an occupying force. The occupying entity understands that it would be responsible for providing health, education, and other services, with no guarantees that a complete occupation would lead to the elimination of Hamas. This is particularly significant, as Hamas emerged in the 1980s when the Gaza Strip was under full Israeli control."
The Zionist entity also proposed, according to Netanyahu, to maintain security control over the Gaza Strip, and leave civil administration to local officials not affiliated with Hamas or the Palestinian Authority, with some Arab countries contributing to governance and reconstruction. This scenario ended in a "catastrophe" because the Zionist entity was looking for mythical creatures to help it in Gaza, according to analysts.
There is also an American proposal for a major deal, according to the Associated Press, represented by the Arab countries gathered around it, and the proposal aims to resolve the conflict that has been going on for decades, and the proposal is based on a plan to reform the Palestinian Authority to govern Gaza, with the help of Arab and Islamic countries.
But the American proposal was rejected by Netanyahu and his gangs, who said that this proposal "will represent a reward for Hamas, and will lead to the establishment of a militia state within the borders of the occupied territories of 1948.
The Palestinians say that the only solution to stop the cycle of bloodshed is to establish a Palestinian state on the lands of Gaza, the West Bank and East al-Quds, while Hamas says that it accepts the two-state solution, at least temporarily, and adds that it must be part of any post-war settlement.
Hamas presented a different deal and proposal, which includes a multi-stage agreement, stipulating the release of prisoners in Gaza, in exchange for the release of Palestinian prisoners, the withdrawal of Israeli occupation forces from Gaza, and a long-term ceasefire, with the reconstruction of the Strip. The latter was agreed upon in Doha and is very similar to what is known as the plan or proposal of former US President Joe Biden, with some differences.
Implementing this proposal means that Hamas will remain involved in managing the Gaza Strip despite the widespread destruction and the large number of deaths suffered by the Palestinians after the Zionist aggression on October 7, and it seems that this scenario was the closest to being implemented practically. To prevent the Palestinian Authority from being embarrassed by returning directly to the Strip, and to reduce the possibility of security chaos in the Strip.
Despite American demands for the necessity of developing a plan on who will run the Gaza Strip after the war, war criminal Netanyahu has been emphasizing his continued refusal to determine a strategy for the "day after" the war, in light of the Palestinian Authority's refusal to return to the Strip at the head of a tank, and his statements about his refusal to hand over the Gaza Strip to the Authority.
Finally, it can be said that the most prominent scenario for the "day after" the war in Gaza is that the Palestinians and their valiant resistance, with the support of Arab and Islamic countries and members of the international community, are the ones who must decide who will rule them, not war criminal Netanyahu, Trump, or any other external forces.
"Until now, the issue of the 'day after' the war in Gaza remains the subject of many questions, especially in light of the American positions, which are seen as completely biased towards the Zionist entity, and in light of President Donald Trump's statements, which have been rejected by Arabs, Muslims, and the international community regarding the displacement of the residents of the Gaza Strip."
Trump's proposal to transfer the residents of Gaza outside the Strip created a unified Arab and Islamic front in support of the Palestinians, and in rejection of the displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, and during the past period the features of the Zionist-American vision for the post-war phase to manage the Strip have eroded.
"With the recent prisoner exchange agreement between Hamas and the Zionist entity, and the majestic scenes that accompanied the handover process, a solid fact emerges: Hamas is not just a resistance faction, but rather an embodiment of the will of Gaza. Resistance is not merely a passing tactic; it is an enduring doctrine deeply embedded in the consciousness of the Strip's residents.
The 'day after' has become a project that the Palestinian resistance is shaping with its own hands, through its balanced discourse and wise management. Hamas is redefining what steadfastness means—not only in confronting the occupation, but also in restoring the Islamic and Arab identity that the occupation forces sought to obliterate."
"The head of the Zionist entity's government, war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, promised a complete victory over Hamas and the return of Israeli prisoners by military force. However, he and his government failed to achieve this, as they initially believed this victory could be accomplished within weeks. Additionally, the occupation failed to meet its declared goals.
Most Israelis oppose the presence of large forces in a region that houses around 2.3 million Palestinians, as an occupying force. The occupying entity understands that it would be responsible for providing health, education, and other services, with no guarantees that a complete occupation would lead to the elimination of Hamas. This is particularly significant, as Hamas emerged in the 1980s when the Gaza Strip was under full Israeli control."
The Zionist entity also proposed, according to Netanyahu, to maintain security control over the Gaza Strip, and leave civil administration to local officials not affiliated with Hamas or the Palestinian Authority, with some Arab countries contributing to governance and reconstruction. This scenario ended in a "catastrophe" because the Zionist entity was looking for mythical creatures to help it in Gaza, according to analysts.
There is also an American proposal for a major deal, according to the Associated Press, represented by the Arab countries gathered around it, and the proposal aims to resolve the conflict that has been going on for decades, and the proposal is based on a plan to reform the Palestinian Authority to govern Gaza, with the help of Arab and Islamic countries.
But the American proposal was rejected by Netanyahu and his gangs, who said that this proposal "will represent a reward for Hamas, and will lead to the establishment of a militia state within the borders of the occupied territories of 1948.
The Palestinians say that the only solution to stop the cycle of bloodshed is to establish a Palestinian state on the lands of Gaza, the West Bank and East al-Quds, while Hamas says that it accepts the two-state solution, at least temporarily, and adds that it must be part of any post-war settlement.
Hamas presented a different deal and proposal, which includes a multi-stage agreement, stipulating the release of prisoners in Gaza, in exchange for the release of Palestinian prisoners, the withdrawal of Israeli occupation forces from Gaza, and a long-term ceasefire, with the reconstruction of the Strip. The latter was agreed upon in Doha and is very similar to what is known as the plan or proposal of former US President Joe Biden, with some differences.
Implementing this proposal means that Hamas will remain involved in managing the Gaza Strip despite the widespread destruction and the large number of deaths suffered by the Palestinians after the Zionist aggression on October 7, and it seems that this scenario was the closest to being implemented practically. To prevent the Palestinian Authority from being embarrassed by returning directly to the Strip, and to reduce the possibility of security chaos in the Strip.
Despite American demands for the necessity of developing a plan on who will run the Gaza Strip after the war, war criminal Netanyahu has been emphasizing his continued refusal to determine a strategy for the "day after" the war, in light of the Palestinian Authority's refusal to return to the Strip at the head of a tank, and his statements about his refusal to hand over the Gaza Strip to the Authority.
Finally, it can be said that the most prominent scenario for the "day after" the war in Gaza is that the Palestinians and their valiant resistance, with the support of Arab and Islamic countries and members of the international community, are the ones who must decide who will rule them, not war criminal Netanyahu, Trump, or any other external forces.