Sana'a - Saba :
The war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist government chose the policy of assassinations, which is rooted in the roots of the Zionist entity, to escape from its strategic defeat in Gaza Strip, to start by assassinating Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in the southern suburbs and Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran within less than 24 hours, and Netanyahu and his gang graduated in his assassinations from first to second to third grade to the assassination of the Secretary General of Hezbollah, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah.
The Zionist enemy has assassinated major figures in Hamas movement, such as Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Dr. Abdel Aziz Rantisi, Salah Shehadeh, Ibrahim al-Maqadama, Yahya Ayyash, Ahmed al-Jaabari, and others.
However, the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, head of Hamas, and Fouad Shukr, a Hezbollah military official, in Tehran and Beirut, had a special impact and important goals in the context of the ongoing battle since October 7.
It seems to the observer that Netanyahu's goal of the assassinations is to erase the Palestinian cause in cooperation with the incoming US administration with its war fleets. It also seems that Netanyahu has a strategic vision that is not new: liquidating the Palestinian cause through normalization with soft Arab entities and integrating the Zionist entity into the Arab region, in addition to preventing Iran or any Arab or Islamic country from possessing nuclear weapons, to be the hegemon in the region and monopolize strategic deterrence in the Middle East.
With the assassination of Sayyed Nasrallah, Secretary of Hezbollah, the region is entering a new phase of political and military escalation, which may have profound repercussions on the internal policies of countries , their alliances, and this pivotal event will portend radical shifts in the political, military , security landscape of the region, and may reshape the map of regional alliances and conflicts.
With this major event, the assassination of the master of martyrs Nasrallah, the region has entered a new and dangerous juncture that warns of the possibilities of a comprehensive regional war, as the axis of resistance will not stand idly by and the possibilities of a strong and harsh response are highly anticipated and Iran will not allow Hezbollah to be liquidated or removed from the balance of power in the region.
The assassination of Sayyed Nasrallah was not the first of its kind. It was preceded by the assassination of the head of the political bureau of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran, which also came at a time when the American diplomatic effort was aimed at a ceasefire.
Netanyahu's dual goal of assassinating Haniyeh in Tehran and targeting Hamas and its leaders is to push Iran to become a direct party in his war against the Palestinians, as a prelude to an expanded war in which the United States would be forced to intervene to defend the Zionist entity against Iran and the resistance axis.
Netanyahu is trying hard to prolong the war to protect his political future and his government from falling, by seeking an image of a tactical victory, such as the assassination of Palestinian and Lebanese resistance leaders, as long as the resolution of the battle is unlikely, which achieves for him to prolong the battle until the US elections, in the hope that it will provide him with a new title to manage the scene of the relationship with the Palestinians, especially if the candidate Donald Trump, who in his previous term identified with Netanyahu's goals of moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Al-Quds and prepared the deal of the century, is the newcomer to the White House, is the newcomer to the White House.
Netanyahu had previously tried and failed to prevent President Barack Obama from signing the nuclear agreement with Iran, but he succeeded in pushing former President Donald Trump to unilaterally withdraw from the agreement, pushing Washington to clash with Tehran.
On the other hand, Iran succeeded in turning sharp corners with Washington and the European Union, but Haniyeh's assassination in Tehran, months after the Zionist entity bombed the Iranian consulate last April, put Tehran in a narrow corner with no options but to respond strongly, while being careful not to go to a regional war, unless imposed by the usurper entity.
Over the past years, a "balance of terror" has emerged between the axis of resistance and the Zionist entity, which is a product of the evolution of the "rules of engagement." But with the usurper entity breaking the contract of the rules of engagement by following a policy of cowardly assassinations, it seems that the axis of resistance is about to adopt a new form of confrontation with this entity and its Zionist gangs, the entity and its Zionist gangs will live a real state of terror by the axis, which is an inevitable reality, with the entity unable to size, timing and extent of it.
After the assassination of leaders such as Ismail Haniyeh and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, it seems that the axis of resistance is determined to force the enemy to pay large and expensive prices in response to its treacherous attacks.
| more of (Reports) |