Sana’a - Saba:
Over two months of strategic operations launched by Lebanon’s Hezbollah in the "Awli al-Baas" battle against the Zionist entity, the latter has suffered significant human and military losses. However, the entity continues to conceal the extent of these losses under its strict military censorship policies.
In this context, Hezbollah published an infographic, summarizing its military operations from September 17 to November 16 on Sunday. The infographic highlights the scale of the Zionist entity's losses as documented by the resistance.
According to Hezbollah’s data, the Islamic Resistance carried out 1,349 military operations during these two months, resulting in over 100 fatalities and more than 1,000 injuries among enemy forces. The average number of operations per day was 22.
Hezbollah said: "In two months, the resistance targeted 61 military vehicles, 53 command centers, 30 artillery positions, 17 factories and military companies, and 11 training camps. He added that it also targeted ten airports and seven drones, in addition to targeting four military warehouses, four showers and fortifications, two settlement units, two technical equipment, an army workshop, and a military checkpoint.
During the same period, Hezbollah confirmed that it had attacked 456 settlements, targeted 361 military posts, 164 military bases, and 127 border posts, and carried out 25 operations to confront the advance of the occupation forces. In addition, it targeted 101 military barracks, 58 occupied cities, 29 drones, and aircraft, and 28 operations to confront an infiltration operation. He pointed out that these figures indicate the number of times targeted.
Hezbollah used 1,047 rockets, 84 artillery 124 air weapons, 65 guided missiles, 29 air defence weapons, 12 sniper and machine gun weapons, and ten engineering weapons, he said. He pointed out that these numbers are for the number of shooters, not projectiles.
Commenting on the home front of the Zionist enemy, Hezbollah said that it had targeted more than 100 evacuated settlements, 30 km from the beam of the evacuated area, and 150 km deep and that it had forced more than 300,000 settlers to flee.
In the ongoing confrontation between the Zionist enemy entity and the Lebanese Hezbollah, media professionals and researchers are monitoring the selectivity practiced by the usurping entity in its declarations and the material and human losses it conceals in its capabilities, in line with its military and political strategy, something it repeats with every war it fights.
The researchers confirm that the Zionist entity imposes strict military censorship on its media regarding the losses resulting from Hezbollah strikes, which mainly affect military targets.
Researchers attribute this censorship and obfuscation to many reasons, the most important of which are protecting the right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu, preserving the morale of the Zionists, and practicing psychological warfare against people who believe in the usefulness of resistance.
This censorship is because what is happening on the Lebanon front, in particular, is a precedent since the Palestinian Nakba in 1948, as it strikes the well-established security doctrine of the Zionist community, which is based on "taking the battle to the enemy's land", while the strikes this time reached most parts of the occupied entity, including the economically and politically important city of Tel Aviv.
On September 23, the Zionist enemy army launched the "most violent and widespread" attack on Lebanon, since the start of confrontations with Hezbollah on the eighth of October 2023, leaving hundreds of martyrs and wounded in Lebanon, and unknown losses in the enemy entity.
Since then, the Zionist enemy has published videos of air strikes it says target Hezbollah positions, or scenes of its air defenses hitting missiles launched from Lebanon or drones over the occupied territories whose fate is unclear.
In addition to posting photos and footage of distant smoke plumes, fires in open spaces, empty warehouses, charred cars, damaged buildings or farms, or declaring that his infrastructure had been bombed without detail.
As for casualties, the Zionist enemy authorities have only announced limited occasions of minor and sporadic casualties among recruits or settlers, due to rocket fragments, or "panic while fleeing to shelters," according to his usual accounts.
It is also noteworthy that the Zionist enemy army is forced from time to time to announce a "difficult event" in the Gaza Strip or Lebanon without revealing its full merits or the number of dead and wounded, amid talk of following a certain mechanism through which it covers up the reality of its losses.
At the media level, the Zionist enemy seeks to secretly monopolize the narrative of war, especially directed at the West, as the availability of information and data will allow the resistance and the Arab and international media to form a different or hostile narrative.
During October, the Zionist enemy army witnessed an unprecedented wave of human and material losses, which made it one of the bloodiest months in its modern history. Those losses were the result of the escalation of military actions on various fronts, particularly in the south against Hamas and on the northern front against Hezbollah.
The pressure on the home front in the Zionist enemy entity is steadily increasing, as the enormous human and material costs have led to sharp reactions from the Zionist public, which began to question the feasibility of continuing the escalation on the northern and southern fronts.
Analysts believe that the losses suffered by the Zionist enemy army during October are the largest in years and that continued fighting with such losses could have far-reaching strategic repercussions.
According to some observers, these events raise questions about the readiness of the Zionist enemy army to deal with multiple challenges at the same time, especially with the change in the methods of warfare of its opponents. Both Hezbollah and Hamas rely on unconventional combat strategies that rely on tunnels, drones, and precision-guided missiles, tools that have made it difficult for the occupation army to achieve complete superiority.
Zionist circles acknowledged that the second phase of the ground maneuver is another version of the failed first phase that will exacerbate the human losses, while Hezbollah escalated rocket fire and drones, and confirmed that Israel's quest for a political solution is only an attempt to achieve what it did not achieve in the war.
It concluded in its description of the crisis Zionist scene, that there is no solution to the launch of rockets from Lebanon to the north and center of occupied Palestine, the ground operation to more human losses for Golani forces and other forces, and the matter is repeated in the so-called second phase, and that "Israel" is in front of a dead end, and that things are dependent on the results of the battles on the ground and the extent to which "Israel" bears human losses, while the repercussions of launching rockets and drones are growing, whether in hitting sensitive targets or in confusing the home front with all Its moral levels, infrastructure and economy.
| more of (International) |