Capitals - Saba:
Regardless of the discussions about who is the winning candidate in the US presidential elections that will be held on Tuesday, it is certain that this will not change anything in the American position regarding the absolute support for the Zionist enemy entity that was established on the extermination of the Palestinians, just as the United States was established on the extermination of indigenous peoples and on the sweat and blood of slaves.
As the positions shown by the current presidential election campaign that ends tomorrow indicate that the arrival of either of the two candidates for the elections, Democratic Kamala Harris and Republican Donald Trump, to the White House is a continuation of the endless American incubator and support for the Zionist enemy entity and the crimes of genocide it commits.
There is enough evidence between the Democratic and Republican parties and the Zionist entity that the US election battle is nothing but an imaginary battle that can be summed up by citing the statement of the late Cuban President and great resistance fighter Fidel Castro: “When he was asked about the US elections in 1960, which one do you prefer, Nixon or Kennedy? He replied: “You cannot compare two shoes worn by the same person. America is only ruled by one party, the Zionist party, and it has two wings: the Republican wing represents the hardline Zionist power, and the Democratic wing represents the soft Zionist power. There is no difference in goals and strategies, but the means and tools differ slightly, to give each president a kind of privacy and room for movement.”
Therefore, the arrival of Trump to the US presidential seat or Harris will not advance or delay the fate of the steadfast, outrageous US policies against the Palestinian people, and its denial of Palestinian rights.
If we look at the position of both candidates, since the first moments of the Zionist war of extermination against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the rest of occupied Palestine, there was a race between the Democratic and Republican parties to declare their absolute support for what they called the “right "Israel" in defending itself, and the boasting reached its peak with statements in which they exchanged, which of them is more loyal to "Israel" and its Zionist project. Trump regularly describes himself as "Israel's" best friend, and said during his speech before the American Zionist Council in Washington on September 19, "We will make "Israel" great again"... stressing that with the vote of American Jews, he will be their "defender" and "protector" and that he is "the best friend of American Jews in the White House."
Trump stated that the October 7 attack was "one of the darkest hours in all of human history", claiming that it was "an attack on humanity itself", and reiterated his assertion that the relationship between the United States and "Israel" is strong and lasting, but will be "stronger and closer than ever" if he wins the election.
As for Kamala Harris, she is Vice President Joseph Biden, and her positions are no different from his, as she supported the Zionist entity and the Zionist genocide crimes.
Harris always emphasizes in her statements the importance and special nature of the long-standing alliance between the United States and "Israel". During the ceremony commemorating the October 7 attacks, Harris and her Jewish husband Doug Emhoff planted a pomegranate tree in the garden of the Vice President's residence, as a symbol of the continuity of the alliance with "Israel".
Harris has not taken any decision against arming "Israel", and she still calls for the same American position on "Israel's" right to defend itself. At the Democratic Party conference last August, she refused to meet with representatives of the bereaved Palestinian families, who lived through the horror and horror of genocide, and many of their children fell victim to Nazi Zionism, while she met with representatives of the Zionist families, and the conference organizers gave them the right to express their position, and prevented representatives of the Palestinian and Arab community from expressing their position.
Not only that, but the Democratic candidate refused to meet with them, and thus her positions calling for an end to the war, and the use of a relatively positive political phrase in favor of Palestinian rights, did not change the essence of her position towards the ongoing conflict, and she did not return with a decisive and clear position against the Nazi Zionist encroachment and brutality.
Accordingly, writer and political analyst Suleiman Basharat confirmed in a special interview with Quds Network that both Harris and Trump will do their best to try to decide the battle in favor of the Zionist enemy in the next stage, while the battlefield remains the biggest dilemma that will face the occupation and the American side alike, and the ability of the resistance forces to impose a new reality and additional challenges, forcing the United States and the occupation entity to stop the war.
As for the claims of candidate Kamala Harris and Trump's talk about stopping the war, Basharat says: The candidates' talk about stopping the war is part of the propaganda discourse linked to the election campaign, and is far from the actual decision on the ground, because the decision to go to war and continue it was prepared in advance before the elections, with neither of them having the ability to achieve their claims.
Here, Basharat expects that the phase following the elections will witness a high-intensity escalation in the region, which may be Zionist-driven by Netanyahu, his government, and the religious Zionism movement, and making the United States of America the one leading the war itself in the next phase, and not relying on the Zionist entity as the American implementing arm in the region.
As for the writer and political analyst Ahmed Rafiq Awad, he confirms for his part that the results of the American elections will not have major or prominent repercussions on the course of the Zionist war of extermination in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon, because the influential parties within America are not affected by the change of presidents, while American policy proceeds according to a fixed rule that works to preserve and protect the Zionist entity in the region no matter the cost.
Awad pointed out that the effects of the elections could be in the form of a limited political settlement that achieves accomplishments for the enemy state and its allies, or buying more time, without stopping the war.
As for Harris's statements about stopping the war, Awad said: They are just false allegations, because she is part of the Biden administration that has supported Netanyahu's government since the beginning of the war of extermination, and provided it with weapons and ammunition that were used to slaughter the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip for a whole year, so Harris's talk is just election propaganda, far from reality.
Regarding the repercussions of Trump's victory, Awad described it as a real predicament, based on what Trump previously stated about expanding the borders of "Israel" and annexing the West Bank, and his work to end the two-state solution and supplying it with weapons in a large way while providing additional cover for the war of extermination on the Gaza Strip.
In turn, political analyst Ahed Farwana told Al-Quds Al-Arabi: "There is no difference between Harris's or Trump's victory regarding the Palestinian issue," noting that the experience with Biden, who came with slogans of establishing peace, establishing a Palestinian state, and repairing what his predecessor Trump had spoiled, "did not achieve anything."
He notes that Biden and Harris participated with the Zionist enemy entity in its war on the Gaza Strip and provided all forms of support to Netanyahu's government at all levels, saying: They "were also like a drug to the people, by deluding them into bringing about a calm at various times, while the occupation government continues its war of extermination against the Palestinian people."
Farwana stresses that it is not expected that Harris will deviate from this line despite her multiple statements about the necessity of stopping the war, noting that these statements are nothing more than slogans to throw dust in the eyes and try to win Arab and Islamic votes in the United States of America.
He explains that Trump, who provided all support to Netanyahu during his first term, is expected to be a major supporter of Netanyahu.
He added, "Both of them, whether Harris or Trump, will not abandon their support for the occupying entity in all forms, although the method differs. Harris relies on the evasive approach and selling illusions, while Trump relies on the direct and rude approach."
| more of (Reports) |