Sana'a - Saba:
Washington's allies are in a very critical position; US President Trump's policy and recent positions have embarrassed them, or rather, have put them before a real test of their relationship with their homelands, as they have to choose, after the Trump-Zelensky incident, either the interests of their people or submit to Washington at the expense of their national interests.
Since the first day he took office and entered the White House, US President Donald Trump has not stopped making statements that are loose from diplomatic controls and sometimes contradictory and making decisions that raise concerns in the world.
Trump's illogical and unrealistic statements can be read clearly by stopping at his desire to seize the Gaza Strip from Palestine, Greenland from Denmark, for Canada to become the fifty-first state of the United States, and for the United States to regain control of the Panama Canal.
The most dangerous thing about these statements is what concerns our Arab region in Trump's desire to seize the Gaza Strip while reiterating the need to displace Palestinians from the Strip to Egypt and Jordan, which has led to many reactions rejecting this plan and this logic at the same time.
We also see him announcing Washington's withdrawal from the Human Rights Council and stopping funding for UNRWA to please the Zionist entity, and saying that there are no guarantees that the Gaza agreement will hold, and signing an executive order imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court, which has issued two arrest warrants against the head of the Zionist entity's government, war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, and his former war minister Yoav Galant.
With these positions that are contrary to reason, logic, laws and laws, Trump has unleashed, from the first moment of his re-election to the presidency of the United States, and with the help of his "presidential friend" billionaire Elon Musk, massive chaos by distracting the world's attention, as presidential orders and statements are issued at a very fast pace, enough to fragment any opposition, and currently there is no one who can follow up on all these orders and statements, whether a person or a government.
Trump chose Colombia as a model for what can happen to any country when it says no to the American president. The Colombian president briefly resisted receiving planes coming from the United States to return illegal immigrants, but the American president threatened to impose a 50% tariff on Colombian exports, forcing the Colombian president to back down and agree to Trump’s request.
Trump does not dwell much on the fact that friends and foes of the United States, from the volatile Middle East to China, not to mention Britain, oppose his plan for Gaza, which could undermine the fragile ceasefire in Gaza, as well as the peace agreement between Egypt and the Zionist entity, and also constitutes a violation of international law.
However, the scenes of the influx of displaced Palestinians returning to their destroyed homes in the northern Gaza Strip after the ceasefire and clinging to their land have confused Trump and his administration’s calculations.
Trump’s plan to displace Palestinians from their land has also been rejected by Arabs, Muslims, and the international community.
Trump had previously withdrawn from UNESCO in his first term before Joe Biden in 2017 in solidarity with the Zionist entity, and withdrew from the nuclear agreement with Iran in 2018, and declared - in 2018 after his visit to France to celebrate the first anniversary of the end of World War I - that if it weren't for the United States, the French would speak German! And he reduced the number of his troops in Germany in 2020, in an attempt to blackmail Germany into paying the costs of his troops!
Thus, what Trump's allies call "flooding the region" occurs, while Trump responds with one word: "Favo", as an abbreviation for the phrase "create chaos and then arrange it" except that the first word in it is not "chaos".. In all of this, he confirms the superior, seizing and colonial tendency in the consciousness of the American authority.
The interpretation of this varied between a team that sees his decisions as sudden, ill-considered and driven by the logic of force, and another team that views them as a philosophy to achieve his vision by raising the ceiling of demands until he gets what he aims for through negotiation; But in the end, it clearly presents the ugly face of America and behind it stands its clear colonial goal of control.
| more of (Reports) |